<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Searching For &#039;Search Engine&#039; On Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://josephscott.org/archives/2009/03/searching-for-search-engine-on-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://josephscott.org/archives/2009/03/searching-for-search-engine-on-google/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 02:43:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Scott</title>
		<link>http://josephscott.org/archives/2009/03/searching-for-search-engine-on-google/#comment-1370</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 21:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josephscott.org/?p=913#comment-1370</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the biggest factor behind WordPress becoming popular was SEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the biggest factor behind WordPress becoming popular was SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://josephscott.org/archives/2009/03/searching-for-search-engine-on-google/#comment-1369</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josephscott.org/?p=913#comment-1369</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve also searched on &quot;Search Engine&quot; out of curiosity. I found the results pretty funny too. :) I think it is good to see they&#039;re not just slapping themselves at the top regardless of their content relevancy.

I think there&#039;s something else to learn from this. Perhaps SEO is less important (in ways) than one would think. Usable products and services (like and unlike Google) should always place usability and user experience before SEO...

What are your thoughts about WordPress? Did it become popular through SEO or through word of mouth in it&#039;s community?

There&#039;s too much I could think and type about about in one little comment that&#039;s getting too long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also searched on &#8220;Search Engine&#8221; out of curiosity. I found the results pretty funny too. :) I think it is good to see they&#8217;re not just slapping themselves at the top regardless of their content relevancy.</p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s something else to learn from this. Perhaps SEO is less important (in ways) than one would think. Usable products and services (like and unlike Google) should always place usability and user experience before SEO&#8230;</p>
<p>What are your thoughts about WordPress? Did it become popular through SEO or through word of mouth in it&#8217;s community?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s too much I could think and type about about in one little comment that&#8217;s getting too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Scott</title>
		<link>http://josephscott.org/archives/2009/03/searching-for-search-engine-on-google/#comment-1368</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josephscott.org/?p=913#comment-1368</guid>
		<description>Clearly Google wasn&#039;t concerned about not having their own link in the results, because it&#039;s there on page 3.

You&#039;d be surprised what people type into the search box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly Google wasn&#8217;t concerned about not having their own link in the results, because it&#8217;s there on page 3.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d be surprised what people type into the search box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michiel van der Blonk</title>
		<link>http://josephscott.org/archives/2009/03/searching-for-search-engine-on-google/#comment-1367</link>
		<dc:creator>Michiel van der Blonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josephscott.org/?p=913#comment-1367</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know, but it looked to me like you were searching on Google, meaning... You&#039;re looking at the search engine itself. What&#039;s the point of having a link in the results that points to the page you&#039;re already at? Google knows this of course....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, but it looked to me like you were searching on Google, meaning&#8230; You&#8217;re looking at the search engine itself. What&#8217;s the point of having a link in the results that points to the page you&#8217;re already at? Google knows this of course&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://josephscott.org/archives/2009/03/searching-for-search-engine-on-google/#comment-1366</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josephscott.org/?p=913#comment-1366</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but it&#039;s number 2 on Yahoo :)

http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=search+engine&amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;toggle=1&amp;cop=mss&amp;ei=UTF-8

Once you&#039;re at Google, Google doesn&#039;t need to be in their own search results to get you to their site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but it&#8217;s number 2 on Yahoo :)</p>
<p><a href="http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=search+engine&amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;toggle=1&amp;cop=mss&amp;ei=UTF-8" rel="nofollow">http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=search+engine&amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;toggle=1&amp;cop=mss&amp;ei=UTF-8</a></p>
<p>Once you&#8217;re at Google, Google doesn&#8217;t need to be in their own search results to get you to their site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorelle</title>
		<link>http://josephscott.org/archives/2009/03/searching-for-search-engine-on-google/#comment-1365</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josephscott.org/?p=913#comment-1365</guid>
		<description>&quot;...google is a verb...&quot; too funny. I&#039;m sure their trademark lawyers just love that. :D

Colossus. Wow, That&#039;s a blast from the past. Searching for &quot;search engine&quot; has been around for a while and it is always interesting what turns up. A few years ago, Google was in the top 10 when I first tried this. Colossus wasn&#039;t there, but Dogpile was up near the top.

It&#039;s interesting to me to travel outside of the US and see the popularity of a lot of different search engines and directories rarely noticed in the monopoly content United States. It would be even more interesting if those search results came with some comparative stats. Competition is still alive elsewhere in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;google is a verb&#8230;&#8221; too funny. I&#8217;m sure their trademark lawyers just love that. :D</p>
<p>Colossus. Wow, That&#8217;s a blast from the past. Searching for &#8220;search engine&#8221; has been around for a while and it is always interesting what turns up. A few years ago, Google was in the top 10 when I first tried this. Colossus wasn&#8217;t there, but Dogpile was up near the top.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting to me to travel outside of the US and see the popularity of a lot of different search engines and directories rarely noticed in the monopoly content United States. It would be even more interesting if those search results came with some comparative stats. Competition is still alive elsewhere in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .Net Guru</title>
		<link>http://josephscott.org/archives/2009/03/searching-for-search-engine-on-google/#comment-1364</link>
		<dc:creator>.Net Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josephscott.org/?p=913#comment-1364</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s really surprising. :)
May be Google have forgotten that it&#039;s the search engine, immersed in different amazing new activities?
Or may be it is convinced that he&#039;s popular enough and there&#039;s no need to show himself on &quot;search engine&quot; inquiry?
Or may be G is not a search engine now, it&#039;s more. It&#039;s Google. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s really surprising. :)<br />
May be Google have forgotten that it&#8217;s the search engine, immersed in different amazing new activities?<br />
Or may be it is convinced that he&#8217;s popular enough and there&#8217;s no need to show himself on &#8220;search engine&#8221; inquiry?<br />
Or may be G is not a search engine now, it&#8217;s more. It&#8217;s Google. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjam</title>
		<link>http://josephscott.org/archives/2009/03/searching-for-search-engine-on-google/#comment-1363</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josephscott.org/?p=913#comment-1363</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but &quot;google&quot; is a verb, there&#039;s no need for SEO when your name is a verb.

You don&#039;t &quot;Yahoo&quot; something, or &quot;AltaVista&quot; for something on the internet, you google it.

And besides, Google is so much more than a search engine, but that&#039;s a whole other blog post...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but &#8220;google&#8221; is a verb, there&#8217;s no need for SEO when your name is a verb.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t &#8220;Yahoo&#8221; something, or &#8220;AltaVista&#8221; for something on the internet, you google it.</p>
<p>And besides, Google is so much more than a search engine, but that&#8217;s a whole other blog post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
