Comments on: Minimum HTML 5 Document http://josephscott.org/archives/2008/12/minimum-html-5-document/ Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:54:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Dustin Diaz http://josephscott.org/archives/2008/12/minimum-html-5-document/#comment-195 Dustin Diaz Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:35:38 +0000 http://josephscott.org/?p=503#comment-195 Geoffrey, that's a fun test and all :) But basically the point was that we can actively and confidently use [!doctype html] Geoffrey, that’s a fun test and all :) But basically the point was that we can actively and confidently use [!doctype html]

]]> By: Joseph Scott http://josephscott.org/archives/2008/12/minimum-html-5-document/#comment-194 Joseph Scott Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:43:21 +0000 http://josephscott.org/?p=503#comment-194 Nice catch, that does pass as valid HTML5. That might be a little too minimal though :-) Nice catch, that does pass as valid HTML5. That might be a little too minimal though :-)

]]> By: Geoffrey Sneddon http://josephscott.org/archives/2008/12/minimum-html-5-document/#comment-192 Geoffrey Sneddon Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:46:56 +0000 http://josephscott.org/?p=503#comment-192 That's untrue: the html, head, and body elements all have optional start and end tags. The shortest valid document is: <code><doctype html><title></title></code> That’s untrue: the html, head, and body elements all have optional start and end tags. The shortest valid document is:

<doctype html><title></title>

]]>